Super Lawyers - Badge
US News Best Law Firms 2023
Millon Dollar Advocates
Multimillon Dollar Advocates
America's Top 100
10 Best Attorneys
Top 100 Labor and Employment Lawyer
The American Society of Legal Advocates
10 Best Labor Attorney 2024
ABA - Badge
Elite Lawyer 2023
OCTLA - Badge
Orange County Bar Association
Best Lawyers 2024 James Hardin
The State Bar of California
Super Lawyers
OC Metro Magazine 2014
Lawyers of Distinction 2024
Best Lawyers Hardin Law Group

FMLA and Employee Leave

Hardin Law Group

Is your Orange County employer complying with the various federal and state laws that govern the amount of time off certain employees must be allowed? For example, the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) is one such set of guidelines and can be tricky to navigate, especially when it appears that an employee does not actually qualify for the time off he or she is requesting. FMLA requires covered employers to provide employees job-protected and unpaid leave for qualified medical and family reasons. Qualified medical and family reasons include: personal or family illness, family military leave, pregnancy, adoption, or the foster care placement of a child.

But what happens when an employer doesn’t believe an employee qualifies for FMLA leave? Can it risk a lawsuit for saying no?

For example, what if an exempt, managerial employee takes all 12 weeks of FMLA leave, plus six additional weeks of unpaid leave, and another four weeks due to health problems in the preceding year yet asks to use his FMLA leave during the current year. Does he qualify even if he didn’t work the law’s requisite 1,250 hours?

Unfortunately for the employer, FMLA regulations effectively presume that exempt employees are always eligible for FMLA leave, at least from an “hours worked” standpoint. The employer carries the burden of proving otherwise. The Act states that ‘In the event an employer does not maintain an accurate record of hours worked by an employee, including for employees who are exempt from FLSA’s requirement that a record be kept of their hours worked . . . the employer has the burden of showing that the employee has not worked the requisite hours.’

Many Orange County business owners don’t keep track of hours worked for exempt employees, which makes it difficult to establish that the employee has not worked the requisite 1,250 hours required by the FMLA. There are a couple legal issues that an employer should consider when it comes to employee eligibility for FMLA leave:

  1. The Burden is On The Employer. When an exempt employee’s eligibility for FMLA leave is in question, it is up to the employer to clearly demonstrate the employee did not work 1,250 hours.
  2. Is The Employee Eligible? Eligibility is tested every time the employee requests leave for a “different FMLA-qualifying reason.” In other words, if the reason for leave is the same and the employee previously was eligible within the same FMLA year, the employee is entitled to take leave in this instance. However, if the employee requests leave for a new qualifying reason in the same FMLA year, or if it’s for the same reason within a new FMLA year, the employer may re-test eligibility.

For more information on the application of FMLA to exempt employees, contact the experienced Orange County employment attorneys at Hardin & Associates today.

See What Our Clients Are Saying

I worked with James Hardin on a case against a former employer. He listened to my complaints, outlined the potential case, and went right to work contacting them and...

Kandice L. Manhattan

My family had an employment law issue and needed some assistance and advice. We did not engage the firm to represent us, just help us out and see if it needed to go that...

Matt H. Manhattan

James is an incredibly intelligent and hardworking attorney. After presenting him with a difficult case, I am more than satisfied at the settlement that was reached. He...

Arpee O. Manhattan
cf-image.jpg

Connect

Free Consultation 310.606.2122

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form